From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-94126-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E6C1382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2021 21:42:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9DFE0901;
	Thu,  1 Apr 2021 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BC0E08F0
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2021 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org,  Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: get rid of
 eutils in <EAPI-8, fix eclassdoc, make some funcs internal
In-Reply-To: <3350735.dWV9SEqChM@tuxbook> (Andreas Sturmlechner's message of
	"Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:59:48 +0200")
References: <5252907.rdbgypaU67@tuxbook> <2537255.vuYhMxLoTh@tuxbook>
	<2127539.vFx2qVVIhK@tuxbook> <3350735.dWV9SEqChM@tuxbook>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:42:10 +0200
Message-ID: <uo8exznpp@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.91 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 52c54602-f2d4-40d3-951e-45f235bb8173
X-Archives-Hash: 4279b6dad7cbc84f0a8e543df03f93cd

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
=20
> +# @FUNCTION: test-flag-PROG
> +# @USAGE: <compiler> <flag>
> +# @INTERNAL
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Returns shell true if <flag> is supported by given <compiler>,
> +# else returns shell false.
>  test-flag-PROG() {
> +	[[ ${EAPI} =3D=3D [5-7] ]] ||
> +		die "Internal function ${FUNCNAME} is not available in >=3DEAPI-8."
> +	_test-flag-PROG
> +}

Any reason why this cannot say "... in EAPI ${EAPI}." as I had suggested
earlier?

(Same for the other patches in the series.)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmBmPjIPHHVsbUBnZW50
b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uWbAH+wfqCZ+qDsss345LNYbggGipUz9kGqww46HM
xWJ+O7cx9K6heUKnwFKVyUligAtt3hk3VFsS4gSYcqGIIMS82Sssf2q5QpZ/A1S0
c48bYOAq9uA8mYUgqnGtPu6ruRxbLRV6RrtgSRhQv/RWNgbz8zX8oYcFmtT7JnFg
ntTUlcRfn+SlIVqW75wVRRrrxAfxvs9nyd+rh99GhdeWrnZLXg+8A/KTlD9t1Ocn
27Pvg7N+2UNbd8ugMdeCO4CcgHXcJvtK7s067to3nSWhbDiFjIyyam/h/WpjD2qk
oMUGtjRVarRdmwgP/+A5UqHlUbNmzlnKBtnD9EI3plKEvqg2WOw=
=yP6E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--