From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <agenkin@cdf.toronto.edu>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (bashful.cdf.toronto.edu [128.100.31.157])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05132019F8E
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2002 22:52:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (Postfix, from userid 191)
	id 54007420BAF; Sun,  7 Apr 2002 23:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
From: Arcady Genkin <agenkin@thpoon.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xemacs segfault
References: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0204072036490.15896490-100000@the-gimp>
X-Face:  0=A/O5-+sE[Tf%X>rYr?Y5LD4,:^'jaJ!4jC&UR*ZrrK2>^`g22Qeb]!:d;}2YJ|Hq"LHdF
 OX`jWX|AT-WVFQ(TPhFVak)0nt$aEdlOq=1~D,:\z5QlVOrZ2(H,mKg=Xr|'VlHA="r
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 23:52:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0204072036490.15896490-100000@the-gimp> (Dave
 Lee's message of "Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:39:14 -0600")
Message-ID: <uo1ydq978q.fsf@bashful.cdf.toronto.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp,
 i686-pc-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: bf3f8acf-04ab-4bef-888d-2cdc6b1d711c
X-Archives-Hash: e7dd91ccb959ce5d205a23ab0923a3f7

Dave Lee <davel@canuck.com> writes:

> Has anyone been able to figure out why xemacs segfaults on startup?  As
> mentioned before, if you are emerge-ing something, than xemacs will
> actually run w/o segfaulting.  This is strange behavior. TIA,  Dave

Which version?
Have you tried

  xemacs -debug-init
  xemacs -vanilla

Also try running in the terminal with

  xemacs -nw

Perhaps these would help you to pin-point the problem...
-- 
Arcady Genkin
Don't read everything you believe.