From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB349158091 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 566A4E0898; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AE7E0845 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:49:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, William Hubbs Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:29:57 +0200") References: <20220613074411.341909-1-flow@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 591ccc49-2602-4fa8-9c36-9cdbabdfb27b X-Archives-Hash: f7ecacfc2bd371c3081bbccbc4f4afa5 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:44 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> Judging from the gentoo-dev@ mailing list discussion [1] about EGO_SUM, >> where some voices where in agreement that EGO_SUM has its raison d'=C3= =AAtre, >> while there where no arguments in favor of eventually removing EGO_SUM, >> I hereby propose to undeprecate EGO_SUM. >>=20 >> 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/1a64a8e7694c3ee11cd48a= 58a95f2faa Can this be done without requesting changes to package managers? Previous examples are unexporting variables because their size exceeds the limit of the Linux kernel [2], or introduction of additional phase functions that bypass Manifest validation [3]. > "We've been rehashing the discussion until all opposition got tired > and stopped replying, then we claim everyone agrees". [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/721088 [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/833567 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmKm+gQPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uuWgIALw0R6iileAZv2dCR9463BVnDBvegJ88ouww meVgsX8iboqaDJBk8zztmf2NQOJDvd1XxUJtdYSLp0ZtroGtQd3cytCdrIMCexf9 vmU+arAwNvGsE0wje9AyaDNCc6+yY2qeNjZ4nPbm+7/hrJ6YkP7JoYejPfvoeWSb ZUqdEi77XRc6Z+tfNkRjR1ehN8DMtDkwijVsO8lITS++xQHs1+a/SkULbteV58Da hJeJPlLyH6V0xrUlq2mJxYF+AZ2H1b9xGk58uRPyZTXbR1OexZbUrnwSGQ8hUB6U Q38y8d96iHmeTR9cFf/XCAu0EaiMtc3FJs1av40cevkra1O1UTE= =FsN6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--