From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A436C138350 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4152E08D6; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C62EE0887 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from themis (dslb-178-004-106-136.178.004.pools.vodafone-ip.de [178.4.106.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2217534EF83; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:19:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 03/10] glep-0072: Rename bad depgraph state to 'degraded' References: <20200410065847.96199-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20200410065847.96199-4-mgorny@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:19:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200410065847.96199-4-mgorny@gentoo.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Mich?= =?utf-8?Q?a=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:58:40 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.90 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e896d590-f52f-4c06-b453-89832dda453d X-Archives-Hash: 08a5e5e3118896373f315dcc83be8950 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous, > so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use > 'degraded' instead. "Degraded" has a negative ring to it, so can you find another term? How about "lenient" or "relaxed"? > -``testing`` for all architectures where "inofficial" stable keywords are > +``degraded`` for all architectures where "inofficial" stable keywords are I am aware that it isn't your change, but while at it, could you change "inofficial" to "unofficial"? "Inofficial" is a false friend for German writers and (as I've been told by a native speaker) isn't really a word in English. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFCBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAl6QSD0PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uQmIH9AvPCgkvPSAdH57lGEvcWmV2bZQVwaa4PfXF dYWu6ruznF2WxXYLKMGvMAl1U0hhAaJppBYeVEZ4OyAKLzwBt/+TuvhLpcy8ikJP tMpbPQOk83tMv3rpjmsWzuWMhXMBL9RuCF0E+K5eRGsZA9J67136J44GSg16Ze59 i4Ora9WXkMUvX6dxiFTEYLbWiKhccXi2aUuoEivw7+Nza8S+2fPXGkmdmo6utMwG CACJg31+76P/HNq3vXZIPxhON/50/KbWGeqKB7xbPlYVqeLtpGmuWIh+gLOaa9cC UOfWEUTFqjVzeVQRZatG9tAEj721Nh2aESvtWoJYUJ+3s/Lsew== =fQf6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--