From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C2F13933E for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7686EE0CCF; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7DD5E0BB5 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Andreas Sturmlechner Cc: gentoo-dev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] virtualx.eclass: Support EAPI-8 In-Reply-To: <2139995.vFx2qVVIhK@tuxbook> (Andreas Sturmlechner's message of "Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:46:38 +0200") References: <2139995.vFx2qVVIhK@tuxbook> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 23:24:46 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: dafaa070-d13b-4e22-96f3-a457cc442c1c X-Archives-Hash: 14c2f1959012c41cc8a883dffc577d78 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2021, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: =20 > case ${EAPI:-0} in This could be just ${EAPI} now (same for check-reqs.eclass). > - [0-5]) die "virtualx.eclass: EAPI ${EAPI} is too old." ;; > - 6|7) ;; > - *) die "virtualx.eclass: EAPI ${EAPI} is not supported yet." ;; > + 6|7|8) ;; > + *) die "virtualx.eclass: EAPI ${EAPI:-0} is not supported." ;; Use ${ECLASS} instead of explicit name? > esac --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmD0nB4PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uZI4IAKb5N78lmO8kMMkxDQVREUNH7Y/A/skyGyju tvl4nT+pwX5Goc+D08TELqEaeC3m+c86i8WU1dLhHMUXuoAm3mmObWqs5V1lwaZu cat6kZjqK2c25imDhed9rlFHGSvD4YF1d4sJgFexBuSfsNifmG6DBpa81CjOszak uPlO1IlUzJJa07a8NNKhBZF1UGx3/gVTXiYYBMEnWZLGnWsuKlA/HwAbEUVrzF8X fpzuNhQ2DL0laapFTEQemVLxr4xnK1DEx6EC+JYttn/WgZsJr5D7KkUnGs/jBhwE UlVDqywEIByJVMRrII+MmNzXkCO4o0MSeGVDhl7v2Ybyg2sBNlc= =EL6I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--