From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4B715817D for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCC4BE2ADC; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 658ACE2AD9 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:11:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: ltprune.eclass In-Reply-To: <3fb256412dd518ad8224a6c2d36a4bb792ad44c7.camel@gentoo.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Sat, 08 Jun 2024 17:47:53 +0200") References: <3fb256412dd518ad8224a6c2d36a4bb792ad44c7.camel@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 18:11:25 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b0d9db9d-be7d-4922-9cfe-8c337ff00769 X-Archives-Hash: f361f96b9515566385617b2eb7efbe3f --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > No ebuilds are using the ltprune.eclass anymore, so I've marked it @DEAD > for removal. gnome2.eclass still inherits ltprune, shouldn't this be updated first? That is, drop EAPI 6 support from gnome2.eclass? Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmZkgq0PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uD9QH/An//h2WJTSHqH4QbbGXqiCc4sv9FzehRBHz FFiE06hgGTa+VG4lJZWBimxh3UoLt7Lm+bejtJTz9w+mEDhOCHG9TQJ+lqZqYLGU M1qRYjOm9eTxDK1C26MUBDQYBhxHeYvXvU5mXT38LeykcL4ZRNiM/G1b3rTxvdsE vsCh3timGITCiEZnBgVBZdVn52zdO1NutpimTwuYhxbcgPaF9cMN1WIDHb83Zlva b0Armd31QAxMX7v21AQ0cGIUmbQTtfPi4NUaIkt61DdowQazji7Dil5ukjA31e3o u+37Zh4iddKC2SQ5T1IO4l8gZWJgvYNDLsDgnipPDmQpK5pNqHE= =bey0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--