From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90CD8138359 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6173E0848; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99C7E083D for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:46:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, python@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [REVIEW v2 0/2] 2020-09-28-python-2-7-cleanup news item In-Reply-To: <20200928064256.124822-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Mic?= =?utf-8?Q?ha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:42:54 +0200") References: <20200928064256.124822-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:46:07 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6edc11e9-312e-43b9-b82f-7f3ad7fe0c96 X-Archives-Hash: 9598657bf17a57fa5c66a5ea7fb06af7 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > I've figured out a better solution than changing PYTHON_TARGETS and then > revbumping the packages to have users upgrade (which may happen before > they change PYTHON_TARGETS). Instead, I'll revbump these few packages > and remove Python 2 in new revisions. > The majority of users will get the py2-less versions on next @world > upgrade, and the few that need renpy, old mongodb, old kodi... will stay > at current revision. This involves some temporary duplication > on version bumps but I don't think this will be major issue. Do I understand this right, future version bumps will have two parallel ebuild revisions (like r0 and r100) with only the lower revision supporting Python 2.7? Tricky. :) Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAl9xos8PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4ua6cIAJjtysYAFLazqsEmMccNd4LbuuasAkyEbJ9/ hTZSCz3cei6vPPyxIvTJWubnvffvjKONBCF2ochWVl6PZrS5gVNc74jNTTv6/Q5j /gGbA1d1N2JSUYovdiHucKzCwBayI612aSxBIqCujNQa3IhZC15rSxXWF3UOqceN FIz2d5oDAnaFZM/yndcKNM6EIUDz82aUNfeB0yGhv+/V1AipBXRzAlL01PMvxmFD fpM8DHgVmVFX1ljUs7PQt9khb15iYGvMB52KUyamQf4M3aERK0lsgi0QsIRWjGOd PKBF5WbyE+FzKZiXgd+gJfNnuChYxO6Vm2RBz6i5wc4jV9PhAeE= =xe94 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--