From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731E5158064 for ; Wed, 1 May 2024 15:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E3C32BC01F; Wed, 1 May 2024 15:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56A62BC013 for ; Wed, 1 May 2024 15:52:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Maciej =?utf-8?Q?Bar=C4=87?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , Ionen Wolkens Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] .github: Add pull request template In-Reply-To: <1458a60b-57ce-4ae0-9f27-9acc3a8be140@gentoo.org> ("Maciej =?utf-8?Q?Bar=C4=87=22's?= message of "Wed, 1 May 2024 17:05:12 +0200") References: <20240501133259.48778-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <1458a60b-57ce-4ae0-9f27-9acc3a8be140@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 17:52:00 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d12b4cb5-f2be-4c14-be85-dfbd0c78b0bb X-Archives-Hash: 466d39ac8b9d4d19334bdce88247138c >>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2024, Maciej Bar=C4=87 wrote: >>> Also no license link. Afaik all contribs are under GPL-2. >> That's not entirely correct. The files in the licenses/ directory >> aren't, and patches in packages' files/ dirs generally follow the >> license of their upstream project. > See, so it would help to have a doc that talks about the > irregularities. I agree, but such documentation doesn't belong in an ebuild repository, but should be in a dedicated location like the Devmanual or the wiki. Ulrich