From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46FF158042 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A582E089D; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A6FE0884 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:15:32 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ulrich_M=C3=BCller?= To: Patrick Lauer Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New PostgreSQL categories In-Reply-To: <7eb6a37e-bd6a-434b-b97a-21eacdbed981@gentoo.org> (Patrick Lauer's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:49:01 +0100") References: <7eb6a37e-bd6a-434b-b97a-21eacdbed981@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:15:21 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 515acc41-5f7f-41b5-b485-df78c9b637b1 X-Archives-Hash: 78762a6f5e04454b60bad20190c29d3c --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I've just returned from the pgconf.eu conference, and this has > motivated me to try to improve the packaging situation for all things > PostgreSQL in Gentoo. > Right now everything just goes into dev-db/ category. That's not > inherently wrong, but it feels a bit overloaded to me. So I'd like to > add two new categories. I'm relatively indifferent about the naming, > good suggestions welcome, but locally I ended up naming them > "pg-tools" and "pg-extensions". As the name suggests, one category is > tools around PostgreSQL, and the other is extensions. (Or maybe it > makes sense to put all of it into a dev-postgres category?) As briefly discussed in #-dev, I think that "dev-postgres" would fit better with the naming of existing categories. > A good amount of things are in-tree already, a lot of other things > I've accumulated in a local repository. Most of it is very boring > (i.e. most extensions 'just' use a plain Makefile) and has low rate of > change. > The packages involved are: > [...] That's not too many, so maybe a single category would suffice? Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmcf4skPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uj6UH/2mpVrvOUb/73jCDV39SG1RkOm9Q4cKFzJLw pQIcBXwYF1HIZXOoPddMhSjqwv+FjLY2tTOeC9jem01GqqGS16+fP2Excha3/P+N a7Catct6HB96gK7h9YPl95J5AeJ+jl1NONrZ+qQWYN9Scq1c9xKq9BYDsYlEBKYq QCF+Vr8cL9QeQZ9OPyhmhPvKDGwfkSNYXp6lfa4id8kiAaRPPVYxvCrKG/5gkdGE 9g/FPeliVrg5jRHV5zaOnwKW6bPFYW0zpvvPwOkd+ArmhXHyxjXXIadCT8OI8ODu R6928phQNAkOEY4JZTd1r/heb+tC2XcfhQiHxsNsAff/0BjFVR0= =Wo62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--