From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9E4139335 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB07EE084E; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75BF5E081E for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:19:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lua eclasses: support EAPI 8 In-Reply-To: (William Hubbs's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:55:52 -0500") References: <20210616093421.73766-1-marecki@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:19:20 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 5c5bd71f-2d61-4574-858d-463dff36e1c0 X-Archives-Hash: 93d6a27e580e7b14aee1179695dc9c76 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, William Hubbs wrote: > Is portage stable already supporting eapi 8? if so when did that > happen? portage-3.0.20 was the first version supporting EAPI 8, and 3.0.20-r6 is currently being stabilised. [1] > If not we can't support it in eclasses yet. I don't think that we ever had such a restriction. How would we test support for a new EAPI in Portage, if we wouldn't allow ebuilds and eclasses using it? Ulrich [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/796503 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmDbcjgPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4umfMH/AiydMEx2KLL9500cTVqxAn1EeFJ3ezpCf6n vaflGNAXRFUJagEFLBgvAdwC/X8FXgpa+hvzU9VEyRg5OvBfhX9Bkn7MkRjHUIy9 nQQgzv9wE93IR5Cpm9dJiXWPUOl35rNiHhXKUcGgQMo3grvCXYOdyeYaWqpinNrz 8IqsyQu4e16OCjEPfYgyU3ZvZlT4Jcmke+ng/J2Es4eSsH5quFzYZfa+3UMSxAEu u+avvGbInHngDHjMQdxcVHVLFHL0AQ8VsI9sqPJxNMPBvg0Nxstg4uyBhr9CiZPT OcZpfNWolh3DJPeL4c9Dw6hIcbUvOGoIUGn7f+wIBi2wWMSvVYM= =2uha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--