From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C48A158091 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 529FCE0936; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFAAEE08A0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Florian Schmaus Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM In-Reply-To: (Florian Schmaus's message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:34:43 +0200") References: <20220613074411.341909-1-flow@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:26:43 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 571d6d66-4ad6-41af-a708-91293fb0db67 X-Archives-Hash: ddf246891b8abea9ff98dbdf143ddfe1 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Florian Schmaus wrote: >>>> Judging from the gentoo-dev@ mailing list discussion [1] about EGO_SUM, >>>> where some voices where in agreement that EGO_SUM has its raison d'=C3= =AAtre, >>>> while there where no arguments in favor of eventually removing EGO_SUM, >>>> I hereby propose to undeprecate EGO_SUM. >>>>=20 >>>> 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/1a64a8e7694c3ee11cd4= 8a58a95f2faa >> Can this be done without requesting changes to package managers? > What is 'this' here? Undeprecating EGO_SUM. > The patchset does not make changes to any package manager, just the > go-module eclass. > Note that this is not about finding about an alternative to dependency > tarballs. It is just about re-allowing EGO_SUM in addition to > dependency tarballs for packaging Go software in Gentoo. OK. Thanks for the clarification. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmKnEOMPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uXo8H/3TJRNpSzecCJOc5HD82wR7JtmpBx+OzLeYJ ldWEa+shTYAEpRzKHgwzm+gisyRVHrtAdjdD5A/AJib59IDIYZGuAN8vFwfR83Gk mli+PSsSRtkKigC/i9lsClqZV/gA5TzvTaF5S19XsKmvWenZimpRmBOeAk/fU8/3 RlTHhz5DR1n9rGJ4qMENY6fANPkapxitWHZ0hC9+5q65wJeUBS/H9bmtnywSQ9DW QUFi5pX9LX3XSC8+wdlorA29r3Psfk137jARjrWdjhRJm0scEANZrY+LMDuo9yku eaojGzVxb1lvnF6ThU5gPphVz5famuLCpCcToDWmfkmPhKxI9BM= =t3G5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--