From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ny4SM-0004QN-Sv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:36:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C38E0C20; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE99CE0C1A for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so53443bwz.26 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=FilWFNcA5ukKNqszrFYmOCoyOYDK2caRHBSJrmfMY/c=; b=VsnOj2+F5Z9pBWbs/Nt9rR047v5Kv1vqUxshUxyFE71wtmPX6tUpLA0DF56hzKAhXK Qcgv08luiE8K78qVpLqg5l8DStxvSPh9vQywGDuVDk4AmvWs8edwzd0NgAowfVHdHTmD M/VSKNyp4dsG/SLJ1KavZFwjyeHX/uMzN9wcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cSeEyivyJIaeRJ/nGzmFWXLIFjvVGCfULVOpCnaa+wr+cYEC+NOJXJvSpKbLJSz3R4 eiGg/rlqf2hWN402hINdq5kyXUD0m5KelgymCll8X1vJANvP1GbgTYAhUAZj4D4vGc3i zN8Sm6t9YiqhdIs+ubCxc+eYKG0h+VXUZzifg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.33.199 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 07:36:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1270303944.18734.34.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> References: <1270303944.18734.34.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:36:06 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cb5c92ac5214a318 Received: by 10.204.151.83 with SMTP id b19mr4491414bkw.54.1270305367046; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 5725c507-246c-42ac-9683-f5cffe1a249e X-Archives-Hash: 342d5484b528528a00c6ebf47eb60163 On 3 April 2010 16:12, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 16:40 +0300 schrieb Dror Levin: >> There is currently a wiki for gentoo at gentoo-wiki.com, which is >> running MediaWiki, so it would be easiest to transfer the content if >> we were to run the same software. > > This should happen (if at all) on a per article basis imho. Having the > option to do so (if we want to) is a plus we should consider, though. This also raises the question of license. Our current documentation mostly uses the CC-BY-SA license, while the unoffical wiki adds a non-commercial restriction. By choosing one license over the other we will make copy-pasting content from the source that has the other license, as far as I can see, illegal. I would say that interchange possibilities with our existing official documentation has priority. > Mediawiki sounds like what we want probably, mainly because it seems to > be the most popular one. I don't think that in itself is a very good argument. > Besides that: > - Ubuntu and Debian are using MoinMoin > - Fedora and OpenSUSE use Mediawiki I think we should consider the pros and cons of both these solutions. Does anyone have any links to the considerations that led these distros to make the choice they did? > In addition I'd like to establish a Wiki team with both developers and > experienced users who are able to review Wikipages (specifically every > revision of a page) and tag those pages as reviewed. I agree this is a good idea. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux Qt project lead developer