From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC16138334 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7EC4E0824; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE35E07ED for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fltDV-0001KU-56 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 11:51:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Martin Vaeth Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: mcrypt status Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20180623025046.djmsv44moxuqkv6t@proprietary-killer> <20180625075947.03bd4875@computer> <20180804114328.d4b31c885eba7cb98a1b5fd2@gentoo.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 72d75a68-2d71-47d4-a3c3-9eff7a9194b9 X-Archives-Hash: d71d64f1443cec1f4d50ebed04a3a7d8 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Actually for local symmetric encryption this is the best tool I > know. What is the advantage over gpg --symmetric?