From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4D213827E for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A012E0B3B; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66AD2E0B2A for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B3833F281 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.574 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.562, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MY6UAzOSok1u for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C841933F47A for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqIQ9-00045D-7u for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:11:57 +0100 Received: from lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.42.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:11:57 +0100 Received: from vaeth by lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:11:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Martin Vaeth Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20131208175438.100112a0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52A5689F.1040402@gentoo.org> <20131209115527.4ef48b36@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <21157.60822.905475.532655@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20131210013151.6caff6bf@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-26 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: b5fb5313-3102-44be-9da8-ab190b5eba85 X-Archives-Hash: 59af5aca1261280d1dd3e8acf90a6c4d Tom Wijsman wrote: > > It is surprising that there are only ~400 packages that have multiple > slots available in the Portage tree; trying to reproduce this No need to write a script for such things (export EIX_LIMIT_COMPACT=0 if you do not pipe the output): eix -c2 Packages with a slot different from "0" are found with eix -1, i.e. the following lists packages for which a "0" default would not lead to the desired result (because the only provided slot is not "0"): eix -c1 --and --not -2 Almost 1000 packages!