From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71B91382C5 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE19DE0943; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B4BE091B for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979843412DF for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12332 invoked by uid 10000); 17 Dec 2020 19:41:07 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:41:07 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] glep-0063: Add section about the Gentoo keyserver Message-ID: References: <20201217174909.1711154-1-floppym@gentoo.org> <20201217181216.1825482-1-floppym@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LC6PSvEsRImd411h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: bbb7d1b9-0503-4a8c-bb37-f1bc3bf4beb1 X-Archives-Hash: a7ac3dc7c461218e33084b0c743292ca --LC6PSvEsRImd411h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Thank you for doing this. >=20 > That said, I'm wondering if we should keep SKS pool at all. Did anyone > have any success interacting with it lately? All my attempts of > fetching keys are resulting in server errors. Yes, it worked for me 2 weeks ago when I fetched some keys from a local SKS node to correspond with an upstream developer about a potential security issue recently. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 --LC6PSvEsRImd411h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it. iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEveu2pS8Vb98xaNkRGTlfI8WIJsQFAl/btFFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJE RUJCNkE1MkYxNTZGREYzMTY4RDkxMTE5Mzk1RjIzQzU4ODI2QzQACgkQGTlfI8WI JsSnnRAArzHQvm5hHW9eCK9sjV3UmKWFjPx0eJ4LoDjMxdwk+p8U7Zs/TnkR9gII u9HpCs6re4SuIKAKD8tzMtrao38YCLz7vqrDJ9VEcyvXDyNLRLF0qUZbkaSQOxql 1HMWNtbIZs3HRHvMRACAqzfyQMtQNqWKkTbuuJ+ogMlGBAl69452ZU/60DXZN5Vk 9VlYKG3mFi7Y6GEVtKTaLo/gtn9qDqPzeyFlVk2UMhNY4Vfsya1XiRtI7EJ4hL+S /LPv7Epj2mIRyjuQGb9+FRLaNv3FN+ZloPiMgNFzJKb8n4ecHSVdcChwvUPfKNQl DqN2rRXbdjcFGLqxsztU7UkuLuvGr4IChXBA9qzFHWuzWTVB+9Jpt4xZ9WddB1YD g7Sg/RqYpes6GBYyBML6AkEldGmN2JuirvKGV7PcKukoZQsfEmhfGyc4AhYK9asm ny2zbzBmaRAlj0/qOXxs5mx4RXOYC8KY5K5T8GXPd+iymT1IlfA6hzSoKr3cvvys ks2oeZ6S5X8hTwov7f5me75+YBMtf/CqSL7vv1M79wScJZE8CZjV5kTBmaZa0TQy iO9uBh2unlVKbDv9B2KsDOdEu2ogV96Ta4WLWmPPowpVEHlMLei/m9becCf5pF9J kltHYWbO1Fryv4hAxbsq8xN8CO97XxNcZacmpPudGVBeHLt+iV8= =Gbtj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LC6PSvEsRImd411h--