From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32872138247 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7DF1E0D13; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A75E0D03 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACBB233F959 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14815 invoked by uid 10000); 19 Jan 2014 18:07:24 -0000 Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:24 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.18 heading to ~arch in next ~week Message-ID: References: <201401190552.49079.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201401190552.49079.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 9c7d6b40-67a9-4ee5-bde0-1333e778fe2f X-Archives-Hash: 90fd6659110c8a51b7c819e2e2ef4dec On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:52:48AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > with glibc-2.17 in stable now and glibc-2.19 release in like ~2 weeks, glibc > 2.18 is heading to ~arch. there's been very little reported breakage reported > thus far ... i hope it's because there isn't any vs people aren't using it. > so if people want to try it out ahead of time, that'd be nice. What ever happened with the rpc/libtirpc changes? Will packages that used RPC headers from glibc need more changes, and if so, what? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85