Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution

["Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based
> > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week.
> I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again:
> 	If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to
> 	stop contributing to Gentoo.
Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options
as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO).

Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case,
you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits
would have the DCO SoB signature.

The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85