From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMiTc-00047d-Jq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:20:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4742CE0B82; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B024FE0B70 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7D61B4018 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30441 invoked by uid 10000); 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors Message-ID: References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: a64f5900-11e8-431b-82e5-02f587a4dacf X-Archives-Hash: ce24dbfeaa946d49af55a1017312a4c2 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get > > the closest mirror for downloading. > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual backend, > should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this > pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85