From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NwMvZ-0005ez-Mq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D235E0BD5; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B43E0BD0 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.isohunt.com (b01.ext.isohunt.com [208.71.112.51]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00031B4033 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24601 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 21:55:08 -0000 Received: from tsi-static.orbis-terrarum.net (HELO grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net) (76.10.188.108) by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 14896 invoked by uid 10000); 29 Mar 2010 21:55:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:55:05 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxying and bugzilla Message-ID: References: <4BB11FDB.90506@necoro.eu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BB11FDB.90506@necoro.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f25985bd-6acf-4c68-843e-b5078cea0ac6 X-Archives-Hash: aae1d8eb330aaa5fd0daea0073e06f90 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47:07PM +0200, Ren=E9 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: > 1) Have an implicit restriction, i.e. give them full rights (where > "full" just means: everything they need for handling their bugs), but > make a policy, that they are only allowed to use this for their > packages. In other words: Enforce the correct usage by "legal" ways > instead of teachnically. We've got this available already. The bug to track permissions is here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236218 Ask the developer who is proxying for you to please file a bug to devrel, and they will update that tracking page when they grant you editbugs privileges. > 2) Enforce the restriction technically. I do not know how this could be > done in bugzilla - perhaps by having "proxy-herds", i.e. one herd for > each proxied package and only give the user the full rights, if a bug i= s > assigned to a herd he is a member of. I've wondered before about giving privileges based on the summary line, but I haven't given it much thought beyond that. I think that would probably be more useful than proxy herds, because 'herds' are just actually mail aliases with user accounts in Bugzilla. > Some sort of "bugzilla quiz" which needs to be taken by the maintainer > might be useful in both cases. +1 on that idea too. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85