From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93A0138010 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9486E04BA; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7E1E0462 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9044033D863 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:15:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.582 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.373, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.207, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvGOb-VRmTdY for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D717033D842 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T58iB-00067E-1O for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:15:07 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:15:07 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:15:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: OpenRC network provides revisited Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20120824171010.GA27765@linux1> <1345830614.9332.38.camel@rook> <20120824195809.GA29450@linux1> <503827A9.7030009@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT 1f91845 /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: e85b7b8e-705b-4ca3-a6e1-dccefffa2253 X-Archives-Hash: f1066a9f76f6675d14598b8537dd043e Ian Stakenvicius posted on Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:17:29 -0400 as excerpted: > One thing, though, that i'm not certain of is How the different > runlevels interact -- ie if "net" is started (considered up) at "boot", > it should be (and i assume is, but could be wrong) "up" during "default" > or whatever other runlevel there is, right? I know it was with > baselayout-1 (which i'm actually still running on my NFS-root cluster). Yes, it still works that way. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman