From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A70F13800E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 659B3E07E0; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE6E0761 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344EC1B4007 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.480, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kI2Sg9hpAkI for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481F61B4005 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzhP4-0001Gs-SL for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:04:54 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:04:54 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:04:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Questions about SystemD and OpenRC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1344366029.24762.31.camel@TesterTop4> <502377E7.8010803@gentoo.org> <20120809214332.1a49b0a8@pomiocik.lan> <50241DCA.8080504@gentoo.org> <20120809224738.4d6e3e00@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT 1f91845 /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: f8f284f4-c15e-479c-8d12-3ed7022163d0 X-Archives-Hash: dfdff607ba57d706ddacb002fd969059 Michał Górny posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:47:38 +0200 as excerpted: > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:30:02 +0200 Luca Barbato > wrote: > >> On 08/09/2012 09:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 Luca Barbato >>> wrote: >>>> [W]e could discuss about why reinventing shellscript may >>>> not be that sound and other less glaring, horrid and >>>> appalling design choices. >>> >>> Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? >> >> It is not re-invented, in fact we can use any compatible shell. > > Or anything else what can be spawned for shell. And a lot more what you > won't expect. And guess what, people are actually doing crazy things > with it because someone forgot to tell them how a init.d script should > work. Sounds interesting. A couple quick links to examples of what you had in mind would be nice. =:^) (Or a bit more description, enough to both get the concept and google with would be good, but links could be quicker if you have them handy, and are less likely to spawn even further afield subthreads.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman