From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SaBzI-0007c1-AE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:28:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1C36E0602; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A3CE05A5 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C791B4002 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex): User-Agent: Pan/0.138 (Der Ger\303\244t; GIT 0dca989[...] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.495 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.583, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SopSSO21fxi for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C351B400D for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SaBxj-0003fG-2F for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:27:15 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:27:15 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:27:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20120531195450.GA24805@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.138 (Der Gerät; GIT 0dca989 /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 6a15edd3-81c0-44fe-bd10-b78e2e6b6beb X-Archives-Hash: cb2c93347e6d3a316fd3c79da5e3e705 William Hubbs posted on Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:50 -0500 as excerpted: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:42PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> - You have a commit, that you want to put into the Gentoo tree. >> - You have already pushed it to your github, signed >=20 > If I have a github tree, that would probably be because I didn't have > push access to the official tree, so signing the commit probably > isn'tgoing to matter; I would expect that a gentoo dev who has push > access to the tree would sign the commit when it is put into the gentoo > tree. I don't know what's going to happen to all the overlays with the main=20 tree switch to git, but won't that break various "overlay first"=20 policies, say for the kde overlay? Of course, if all the official overlays are converted to git branches of=20 the main tree... but won't they still require rebasing as they've already= =20 been pushed? (This assumes your workaround idea doesn't work. If it=20 does, great!) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman