[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)

[Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>]

Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:

> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> 
>> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
>> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
> 
> You are right, of course.

> I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then:
> 
>    eclass/bsdmk.eclass
>    eclass/python.eclass
>    eclass/scons-utils.eclass
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild
>    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild
>    gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild
>    net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild
>    sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild
>    sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild

Ouch, in eclasses too!  Yes.  If I came across that I'd have filed bugs 
immediately, as I actually use EXTRA_* occasionally as a user, myself!  
Of course there's also the other PM users who would find these bugs.

Is someone else filing bugs, or should I?  Probably a tracker, along with 
individual bugs (only one for redis, tho)?

What about a repoman check?  Bug for that too?

(If the answer is me do it, please bump me in say 10 days or so if I 
don't.  I'm having stability problems on my main machine right now. ATA 
resets and I've already switched sata card and hard drive. Probably time 
for a new mobo/cpus/etc, but no $$ for it. =:^(  I may end up netbook-
only, severely restricting gentoo upgrades for awhile!)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman