From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNm91-0006Z7-BY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:27:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 144D1E0841; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6978FE0812 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA011B4006 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.507 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.595, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTZPKXBybbX3 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA1401B4030 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNm7k-0002rF-8x for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:26:16 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:26:16 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:26:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: New license: yEd Software License Agreement Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1335519028-sup-4124@raeviah> <1335526185-sup-4610@raeviah> <1335534186-sup-3638@raeviah> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 187e40f /st/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: bc58d47a-2c7f-4dfe-9fcb-ffb3ee4248f6 X-Archives-Hash: c6e89d4698759c8bf54d970662d50642 Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:45:36 +0200 as= excerpted: > Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200: >> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=3Dmirror, >> correct? >=20 > Why RESTRICT=3Dmirror? I'd put RESTRICT=3Dfetch, actually. That works. RESTRICT=3Dfetch is stricter so works, but I'm not sure=20 whether it's necessary as I've not paid attention to the legal=20 distinctions since both are out of the question here, but certainly,=20 gentoo can't distribute, so restrict=3Dmirror for sure. Whether it merit= s=20 restrict=3Dfetch or not I'll let someone else worry about. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman