From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S1aKL-0006EG-5v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:23:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CE55E0B5D; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F96E0B3F for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB2C653E6 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:22:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.512 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9urUfFATQXu for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A504644A6 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S1aIo-0000n6-UB for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:21:58 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:21:58 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:21:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org> <20120224154327.61c051ad@gentoo.org> <3a6095b4d48c4163bb912d6fd608059f@HUBCAS2.cs.stonybrook.edu> <3e5f8f3a918f417e977c7a6f535ea738@HUBCAS2.cs.stonybrook.edu> <989c96a90b7342069ebc9ac29fb53c22@HUBCAS2.cs.stonybrook.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 0efefbf /st/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c75cffda-1e41-4119-89cd-f8f59a16bd4a X-Archives-Hash: e5f54058dbbe8e23d6b05be926ebee31 Richard Yao posted on Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:47:06 -0500 as excerpted: > Also, to avoid any confusion, a proper bootloader for ZFS does not exis= t > in portage at this time. I hacked the boot process to enable the system > to boot off ZFS using GRUB and it will require some more work before > this is ready for inclusion into portage. AFAIK grub2 has a zfs module and therefore zfs support. I was just=20 reading the thread announcing the freeze for grub 2.0, and there was a=20 bit of discussion there about it, so whatever licensing issues they had=20 with it previously, appear to have been worked out, as it's supposed to=20 be part of grub 2.0. So at least the grub-9999 build should have zfs support. 1.99 probably=20 has it in some form, but I don't know what its status is. Those are both= =20 in the gentoo main tree, tho both are masked. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman