From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RyWsa-0000Nf-Qi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:06:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A984E0977; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105C2E07E0 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956EF1B4017 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:05:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.588, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6R0TezltTGu for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46F41B4008 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RyWrX-000112-Mw for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:11 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:11 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages/build systems not honoring LINGUAS and a sane solution Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20120217215806.GH23655@wloczykij> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 19ecd49 /st/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a8d99bab-835d-4827-8428-c1d33b7ef7fe X-Archives-Hash: 7203f25143b832d7fb5287122173ccd7 Piotr Szymaniak posted on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:58:06 +0100 as excerpted: > Long story short: localepurge will be removed from portage If the maintainers are interested, perhaps gentoolkit could adopt it? =20 That would mean it's on most portage-based systems anyway, in my=20 experience. The FEATURES=3Dfixlocales suggestion would suggest keeping the script in=20 portage, modified to be called with the feature hook, perhaps to be run=20 on the fake-install before qmerge and/or binpkging. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman