From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDVJ4-0005bL-36 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:55:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFEAA21C436; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EF021C194 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56AB1B400E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.899, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5WFZfmASYch for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1816C1B4009 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDVIL-0008Fr-5m for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:54:29 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:54:29 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:54:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4E900E3E.2070202@gentoo.org> <4E905C48.20008@gentoo.org> <20111008151336.GN704@gentoo.org> <4E91CDE7.8060201@gentoo.org> <1318311523.21990.35.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 8e43cc5 branch-master) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9f10e2e621b19988fd796b859a48e113 Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:38:43 +0400 as excerpted: >> You are correct, but AFAIK, that's one function of tree-cleaners >> (whether or not the remover is actually on the tree-cleaner team), whe= n >> packages are broken due to going stale against current, and the bugs >> reporting the problem remain open for months without (visible) movemen= t >> (there's some movement here, yes, but was it visible?). >=20 > No treecleaners are supposed to be working on maintainer-needed package= s > only: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/index.xml Thanks for the clarification. I had QA/Treecleaners lumped together=20 somewhat in this regard and appreciate being straightened out. =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman