From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4cpC-0000yh-Ch for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C69E21C1D3; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569DB21C18D for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46261B4030 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -4.652 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.652 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.947, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UZPU5pLc7Jve for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A21B401C for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4coK-0000T0-Sq for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:06:48 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:06:48 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:06:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <2377926.5QqtOKv05M@eve> <1884169.5d71snpPpZ@eve> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 8ea89e0 branch-master) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c166a52e20322007d659bd6871f77d25 Joost Roeleveld posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:36:27 +0200 as excerpted: > I agree, I just used this example to explain that it shouldn't be > necessary to force an initramfs on all users just because there is a > small group who wants to have an extreme setup. Careful with the "extreme". As you no doubt realize by now, the udev=20 folks apparently consider anyone wanting a separate /usr but not an initr= *=20 "extreme". That'd certainly apply double if said admin (since no simple=20 "user" cares about such stuff, in this view) had /usr on lvm. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman