From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QB8cV-0007Dh-K5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:45:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 929811C04F; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619011C047 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B31B4058 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:44:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.525 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6vt8gE-He-U for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBF61B404C for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QB8bj-0002h9-Un for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:44:27 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:44:27 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:44:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> <20110416160519.GA7881@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; GIT 9383aac branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cae0b4329bb79baf1340b91e8da172fe William Hubbs posted on Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:05:19 -0500 as excerpted: > there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. >=20 > I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very > small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my > original announcement. >=20 > - news item release on 5/1 - stabilization on 5/8. How are docs doing? Is there a sample handbook update yet? I've not see= n=20 much action on that bug, but that doesn't mean it's not happening behind=20 the scenes. Still, lack of news from that front has me worried. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman