public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:47:53 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.13.17.47.53@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110413184327.56f6667d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net

Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:43:27 +0200 as excerpted:

> 1) It's a couple of years old now. :)
> 2) Having used it all that time on some systems, I don't see that many
>    superficial changes, or for that matter, deviations from the old init
>    system. I would rather think baselayout-2/openrc simply extends and
>    improves on baselayout-1.

Having used and watched the new version evolve, I agree, to a point.  Yes 
it's an extension of the old.  But like that old tale of the frog in the 
boiling water, I think more has changed than we may realize at first.

Or another way to put it:  If it's so close to the old version, there 
should be little protest in going back.  But I know at least personally, 
I've *NO* interest in doing that!

For one thing, /real/ parallel boot makes quite a difference!  For 
another, I remember baselayout-1's lack of real dependency based ordering 
in early-boot, with the arbitrary ordered list of early-start services as 
a substitute since it couldn't manage dependencies at that level.

But that said, it's a definite extension of the ideas found in 
baselayout-1, indeed.  Stable Gentooers should find much they already know 
in the new system.  It's certainly not the change that switching to 
systemd, for example, would be.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman




  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-12 14:56 [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate William Hubbs
2011-04-12 15:08 ` Patrick Lauer
2011-04-13  0:20   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-13  6:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alex Alexander
2011-04-13  6:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2011-04-13 11:44   ` Marijn
2011-04-13 12:00     ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-04-13 12:07       ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-13 16:43       ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-13 17:47         ` Duncan [this message]
2011-04-13 16:49       ` William Hubbs
2011-04-13 17:33         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-13 19:54       ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 23:16         ` William Hubbs
2011-04-16 16:05 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-16 16:44   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-18  8:38   ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn
2011-04-18 16:08     ` Philip Webb
2011-04-29  7:22 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-29  8:41   ` Dale
2011-04-29  9:00   ` Dirkjan Ochtman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2011.04.13.17.47.53@cox.net \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox