From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:47:53 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.13.17.47.53@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110413184327.56f6667d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:43:27 +0200 as excerpted:
> 1) It's a couple of years old now. :)
> 2) Having used it all that time on some systems, I don't see that many
> superficial changes, or for that matter, deviations from the old init
> system. I would rather think baselayout-2/openrc simply extends and
> improves on baselayout-1.
Having used and watched the new version evolve, I agree, to a point. Yes
it's an extension of the old. But like that old tale of the frog in the
boiling water, I think more has changed than we may realize at first.
Or another way to put it: If it's so close to the old version, there
should be little protest in going back. But I know at least personally,
I've *NO* interest in doing that!
For one thing, /real/ parallel boot makes quite a difference! For
another, I remember baselayout-1's lack of real dependency based ordering
in early-boot, with the arbitrary ordered list of early-start services as
a substitute since it couldn't manage dependencies at that level.
But that said, it's a definite extension of the ideas found in
baselayout-1, indeed. Stable Gentooers should find much they already know
in the new system. It's certainly not the change that switching to
systemd, for example, would be.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 14:56 [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate William Hubbs
2011-04-12 15:08 ` Patrick Lauer
2011-04-13 0:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-13 6:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alex Alexander
2011-04-13 6:52 ` Rémi Cardona
2011-04-13 11:44 ` Marijn
2011-04-13 12:00 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-04-13 12:07 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-13 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-13 17:47 ` Duncan [this message]
2011-04-13 16:49 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-13 17:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-13 19:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 23:16 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-16 16:05 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-16 16:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-18 8:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn
2011-04-18 16:08 ` Philip Webb
2011-04-29 7:22 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-29 8:41 ` Dale
2011-04-29 9:00 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2011.04.13.17.47.53@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox