From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9oUd-0007nJ-V2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:03:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C5A91C082 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96E51C021 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA721B4107 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:21:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.524 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CL5yI7+M2p3r for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03C91B403E for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9npQ-0003W4-9s for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:21:04 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:21:04 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:21:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> <4DA46AF0.2040104@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; GIT 9383aac branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: beafd0fac877badac4ef0070e890f0e6 Patrick Lauer posted on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:08:32 +0200 as excerpted: > On 04/12/11 16:56, William Hubbs wrote: >>=20 >> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. >>=20 > Thanks to all who kept chiseling away at this issue >From a user who has been following developments since the baselayout 1.13= =20 era, with the bugs filed and ultimately fixed to prove it... It really feels good to be this close, as for awhile I wondered if there'= d=20 forever be that gap between ~arch and stable. It really did take a numbe= r=20 of people a monumental amount of effort to bridge that gap, and we owe=20 them a lot of gratitude for it, the more so as we see all that effort=20 paying off. =3D:^) Thanks! --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman