From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OuKLJ-0004Y4-Hn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 151DFE0905; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B593E08F9 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2580F1B4249 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.52 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v45FnH-0vcLu for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517AD1B4087 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuKKm-0004un-I6 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:17:12 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:17:12 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:17:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20100907224727.5d6ccfae@amit.kihnet.sk> <20100910183238.11a96a69@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies; GIT a971f44 branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: fda86af2-c1d2-4fc5-978e-9726313ae6ae X-Archives-Hash: d45b5866094a3287b15c49b5b1dec9e2 Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:32:38 +0200 as excerpted: > If the reason you propose this is visibility, then maybe we should make > the quicksearch option include more than just open bugs. I've thought > about having UPSTREAM/DUPLICATE/INVALID added so that bugzilla users ca= n > more easily discover whether a bug was already reported and was deemed > fixed, a duplicate of another bug or canonically invalid. I've wondered why quick-search didn't do ALL by default, myself. Bugzilla's advanced search is quite difficult for users to get right (I=20 never seem to, tho it may be konqueror's scripting or some such, so I use= =20 quick-search and either specify version or start from the bottom and work= =20 backward as far as I believe reasonable), so I presume most use the quick= =20 search nearly exclusively. That being the case, and further, the case=20 being that users almost certainly will want ALL, having that NOT the=20 default is simply begging for users to miss closed bugs. So I'd say make ALL the default, and have an ONLYOPEN or some such option= ,=20 instead, to cover the current default for those who actually want/need it= . --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman