From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OooAV-0005Zl-QP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14166E0A5A; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BF6E09E8 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16D81B405C for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.776 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.776 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.666, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMtXh7lsVfhC for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3181B4077 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ooo9r-0002HM-9M for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:55:07 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:55:07 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:55:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <4C769E17.2000307@gentoo.org> <201008261429.43173.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies; GIT a971f44 branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e00fde28-b059-4ef4-a633-ae1ad832d93a X-Archives-Hash: 16e42ffb7198a43fcc7fa72f099da55f Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:29:42 -0400 as excerpted: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010 13:02:15 Richard Freeman wrote: >> If there is no debate about whether OpenRC should be adopting it, then >> why is it even being discussed in this way? Let's just do it... >=20 > people saw Roy moving on and got scared. That sums it up nicely, Vapier. Thanks. =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman