From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council manifesto of sping
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:02:12 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2010.06.22.10.02.12@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: AANLkTilkN7w0rz5628wtVPyI3HYTmRB_sAMylCnNdhu9@mail.gmail.com
Arun Raghavan posted on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:43:42 +0530 as excerpted:
> b) For questions like "- Should Python 3.x be stable?", isn't that for
> team leads to decide? And for the council to resolve in case of
> conflicts?
Wouldn't the point for specifically pointing out python 3.x as an example,
that there is in fact quite some conflict on it, as demonstrated by the
threads discussing it right here? If I'm not mistaken, sping has in fact
mentioned that as an example in his "tone" thread, as well. If I read him
correctly, the implication is that before it got to the level it did,
council should have voted on it, thus providing a final answer, as an
alternative to the simmering level of discontent that's not quite at the
boiling over point, that we seem to have with the situation now. He does,
after all, make a strong statement in favor of an "activist" council.
> c) For questions like "- Should developer X be banned?", would you be
> willing to do this if it meant a lot of washing of dirty linen in
> public, or protracted flamewars (and other reasons why we have a bunch
> of level-headed people in place to deal with this calmly and quietly)?
> If no, where would you draw the line? If yes, how would you deal with
> the fallout?
Leaving the question of public or not aside (I've mixed thoughts on that),
if it /is/ to be public, a list other than -dev is IMO a must. I'd also
suggest that it be moderated for non-devs, with a moderator alias to which
users can write, with any mod-alias-subscribed dev having the authority to
forward to the list. A specific mod can volunteer/be-assigned so there's
"someone at home", with the understanding that other devs may subscribe to
the mod alias and forward if they wish.
This is based on experience with the council list, which is public but
read-only (as I think is appropriate) on gmane. Occasionally, I've
replied to individual authors, but a moderator alias would be useful there
as well. If no one on the mod alias then believes my post (and those of
other users) worth forwarding to the list, so be it.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-19 19:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Voting Roy Bamford
2010-06-19 21:06 ` [gentoo-dev] Manifesto for council election Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
2010-06-20 11:19 ` [gentoo-dev] My Council manifest Petteri Räty
2010-06-20 13:47 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Voting Roy Bamford
2010-06-21 16:33 ` [gentoo-dev] Council manifesto of sping Sebastian Pipping
2010-06-21 18:20 ` Petteri Räty
2010-06-21 21:07 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-06-21 19:25 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 21:36 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-06-22 1:46 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-22 2:37 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-06-22 5:13 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 10:02 ` Duncan [this message]
2010-06-22 10:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arun Raghavan
2010-06-30 0:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sebastian Pipping
2010-07-02 14:23 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-07-02 15:50 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-07-02 17:30 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-22 5:15 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 2:37 ` Alec Warner
2010-06-21 19:10 ` [gentoo-dev] My council manifesto Mark Loeser
2010-06-21 19:15 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 19:27 ` Mark Loeser
2010-06-21 19:30 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 21:19 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Voting Mike Frysinger
2010-07-02 22:32 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Voting - Reminder Roy Bamford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2010.06.22.10.02.12@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox