From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPnl2-0005A0-G2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:26:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2789BE08A6; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881CAE06FD for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362B31B4034 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:26:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.892 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.892 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.590, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_VPILL=3.297] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPH5LNeIAw6h for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCD11B403F for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPnkk-0001aB-Pj for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:25:50 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:25:50 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:25:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4C169D32.5080706@gentoo.org> <4C1A9E38.8050206@gmail.com> <20100618014229.GA12490@hrair> <201006181108.29193.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies; GIT a971f44 branch-testing) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 0a7eb1b0-1fca-4dfc-981b-54a79b38e329 X-Archives-Hash: 032659fcbb9585b6a6e4b3f2fb8462b4 Alec Warner posted on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:16:36 -0700 as excerpted: > I don't find it unreasonable to implement a tool as Duncan suggested > because it is not a judgement but a statement of fact. "The license fo= r > app/foo has changed from X to Y. You should review the changes > accordingly by running " Just noting that it wasn't me that made that suggestion, it was Dale. =20 Credit where credit is due and all that. FWIW, I agree it'd be nice, but= =20 also think it sounds like it it could be more work than it's worth --=20 unless someone with the skills and the itch wants to scratch it, of cours= e. (I hadn't replied to this thread previous to this. Not that I hadn't=20 thought about it, but for a moment there, I was wondering if I had replie= d=20 when half asleep (I don't drink so couldn't use /that/ excuse), thus no=20 memory of it, and was wondering in alarm what else I might have said! So=20 it was with some relief that I realized it was Dale's suggestion you were= =20 talking about, not mine. =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman