public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:34:00 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2010.04.09.06.33.59@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 201004091042.45496.mail@patrick-nagel.net

Patrick Nagel posted on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:42:40 +0800 as excerpted:

> On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote:
>> 
>> why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already
>> exists? it seems like a complete duplication of effort.  i'm not saying
>> don't do it, i'm just baffled why we would.
> 
> Well, one reason could be, that the "unofficial" one lost its whole
> database once, and there were other multiple multi-day outages in the
> past. I expect an official Wiki to have a reasonable availability and
> not losing most of the content, breaking links all over the net for
> months.

In addition to that, various invitations have been and I expect will 
continue to be made, to the guy running the current wiki.  For whatever 
reason(s), he doesn't seem particularly interested in running an official 
Gentoo wiki.

In some ways I can't say I blame him.  There's a lot of politics that goes 
into anything Gentoo-official, and it's perfectly sane for someone to love 
Gentoo but have no interest whatsoever in jumping thru all those political 
hoops he'd ultimately have to jump thru, or being the political pawn the 
wiki could likely be if it's as popular and useful as people hope.

Likewise, Gentoo's uncomfortable officially linking to something they 
don't control in any way, shape, or form (except to the extent that we 
could arguably pull his domain name for trademark reasons, if things got 
ugly enough, tho that'd be incredibly bad for EVERYONE, so nobody wants to 
go there!).

Regardless of how justified or not those reasons are, they exist, and are 
a practical barrier to the current wiki and owner becoming the official 
one.  Yet the feeling is, and I as a Gentoo power user agree, we need a 
wiki that we can officially point to, a place for documentation that 
hasn't made it thru the formal Gentoo-doc and GuideXML process, and may in 
fact never rise to that level, but is still valuable.

Also, there's the licensing issue.  The current wiki has a non-commercial 
clause for its content licensing that doesn't seem appropriate for an 
official Gentoo wiki.  And no one except the individual content 
contributors can change that, so practically speaking, a new wiki without 
that clause is needed.  Individual contributors can copy their own content 
over, of course, and other content can be rewritten, but the content 
cannot be wholesale transferred, nor will it be.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman




  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-09  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-05 18:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project Ben de Groot
2010-04-05 18:52 ` Nathan Zachary
2010-04-05 19:00 ` Alex Legler
2010-04-05 19:15 ` Markos Chandras
2010-04-05 21:37   ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-05 19:45     ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-06  2:27 ` Ravi Pinjala
2010-04-06  5:16 ` Stuart Longland
2010-04-06 13:00   ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-06 15:12     ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-08 19:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-04-08 20:13   ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-08 20:56     ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-08 21:37       ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-08 22:55         ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-09  0:38           ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-09 11:26             ` Guy Fontaine
2010-04-09 12:35               ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-04-09 13:02                 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 13:19                   ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-09 12:38               ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 17:02                 ` George Prowse
2010-04-09 17:24                   ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-09 17:32                     ` AllenJB
2010-04-09 17:52                       ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 18:52                         ` Mike Pagano
2010-04-09 17:48                     ` George Prowse
2010-04-09  2:42   ` Patrick Nagel
2010-04-09  6:34     ` Duncan [this message]
2010-04-12 10:28       ` Roy Bamford
2010-04-12 11:32         ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-12 13:13           ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 13:17             ` Arun Raghavan
2010-04-12 13:19               ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 13:22                 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-04-12 13:41                   ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 14:01                   ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-12 16:47                     ` Dale
2010-04-12 18:10                       ` Duncan
2010-04-12 17:59             ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2010.04.09.06.33.59@cox.net \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox