From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:34:02 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2010.03.12.17.34.02@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e117dbb91003120747x45010d52waa422e24a496d5f3@mail.gmail.com
Ben de Groot posted on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:47:13 +0100 as excerpted:
> * Making it harder to get both GNOME and KDE things out of a profile
>> (though the common things in desktop profile right now is quite
>> suboptimal for GNOME)
>
> Either solution is suboptimal, so it is very much about weighing pros
> and cons. In my opinion the split desktop profiles are an improvement
> over the current situation. And it will be even better when your plan
> for eselect profile improvements gets implemented.
IOW, let's not let the (closer-to-)perfect be the enemy of the good.
That has unfortunately stalled progress before. Let's not let it happen
this time. It's going to take some time to get the new eselect profile
features coded, tested, and thru the system (including deprecating the old
version and profiles). We might as well have the benefit of the spit
desktop profiles while the ultimate solution's being worked on, especially
since this one's pretty much ready to go now (days to weeks, including the
mentioned documentation delay, not months or years).
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 14:52 [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-04 15:29 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-03-04 17:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-04 17:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-04 18:15 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-03-04 22:36 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 8:28 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-05 12:57 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 13:46 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-05 17:59 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-05 19:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-05 19:11 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-05 19:24 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-05 19:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2010-03-08 1:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-11 1:36 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-11 20:20 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-11 22:20 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-12 8:36 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-12 9:48 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-12 17:39 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-13 10:07 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-13 23:37 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-12 15:47 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-12 17:34 ` Duncan [this message]
2010-03-13 23:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-23 14:29 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-08 17:13 ` [gentoo-dev] Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review) Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-08 22:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-03-08 22:44 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-13 21:16 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-14 0:02 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-14 5:25 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-09 1:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2010.03.12.17.34.02@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox