From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkQ3H-0003k4-UT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5F5EE0C18; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0C9E0C0A for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418511B4561 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.555 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.555 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iBONcYavNq2J for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A171F1B453E for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkQ2t-0004k3-2z for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:49:31 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:49:31 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:49:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to flag-o-matic's _filter-var Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4B858BA9.2070300@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f1569bab-cb79-4896-bc2d-b32f5c178acc X-Archives-Hash: 16b0a1e9360c5b642d0e869e10971835 ChIIph posted on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:27:21 -0300 as excerpted: > Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's > _filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS. Without this, things like > "-Wl,-O1,--as-needed" won't be affected by any kind of filter since > there are no spaces to separate each flag. As one of the guys with such an LDFLAGS set, thanks. =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman