From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Neo3q-0003as-Um for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:15:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A13CE0EA3; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B7E0E3A for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852201B4012 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.554 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.554 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clK74Hb9mOZ3 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC80767FF9 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Neo3B-0006jW-S0 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:14:37 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:14:37 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:14:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python-3.2-related changes Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201002051740.29640.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20100206165410.GB31648@halcy0n.com> <201002081329.52214.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <201002090910.29098.bangert@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 594910b4-0897-49d0-837c-86c7a8ba8310 X-Archives-Hash: 5df2f5823f37f6ec5b631c4fe63745f4 Thilo Bangert posted on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:10:26 +0100 as excerpted: > having done mass-filings with one bug per package in the past i know ho= w > tedious these are. nevertheless, 1 package per bug it must be - it > makes all kinds of stuff way easier (think of retirements). What about borrowing the boilerplate scripts flameeyes uses for his=20 apparently almost totally automated tinderbox bugs? Change the various=20 strings as appropriate, plugin a list of packages with the problem, and=20 away you go! =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman