From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38595-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NDdbJ-0001KB-Ht
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 461C3E0953;
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C84E0953
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBC6678CE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.047,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id s0sSVNB1ywHo for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F2AB401C
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:37:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1NDdax-0000Fg-J2
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:37:11 +0100
Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:37:11 +0100
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:37:11 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:36:47 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2009.11.26.12.36.38@cox.net>
References: <20091018091154.GB464@gentoo.org>
<7c612fc60911191626p7c32374fhf597787f2d30dfd3@mail.gmail.com>
<4B05F3F3.9020902@gentoo.org> <20091120090338.GK19586@gentoo.org>
<7c612fc60911251543p70dfa240gf09feb46f18e3323@mail.gmail.com>
<20091126085303.GG19586@gentoo.org> <pan.2009.11.26.10.01.23@cox.net>
<20091126101009.GM19586@gentoo.org> <pan.2009.11.26.10.37.10@cox.net>
<20091126105106.GN19586@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 1131ffc3-8a15-43b6-8d1c-8305affb8d76
X-Archives-Hash: 81e178288e2d13e4061ed1d136415ba7
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:51:06 +0100 as excerpted:
>> Are there any less obvious ones
>=20
> Some that you may find are:
> /lib/libm.so
> /lib/libsocket.so
> /lib/libpthread.so
> /lib/libnsl.so
>=20
> On a side note, we have a question about this in our
> prefix-ebuild-quiz[1] (question 5 from the second section).
> I think there's unfortunately no simple way to tell what should be in
> and what unfortunately has to be out. It depends a lot on the host
> system. I feel -- but I can't back this up with hard evidence -- that
> it are usually the libs that are not in *DEPEND that can only be
> available in the host system. Basically because they usually are part
> of the libc, which we assume to be installed.
>=20
>=20
> [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/prefix-quiz
Thanks again. That quiz was particularly enlightening (to this gentoo,=20
not prefix, user) on the type of stuff you think about, as a part of what=
=20
prefix /does/.
--=20
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman