From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0lgD-0005k2-Lf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F0C5E0967; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE95E0967 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F567128 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRABTPqB9djP for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1ED67116 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N0lfz-0002BS-6b for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:37:11 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:37:11 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:37:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE Team Meeting - October 2009 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <225000070910201133m26667ad2q93d1785ddb6b43f5@mail.gmail.com> <200910212059.57730.reavertm@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Cc: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3b76912a-4521-42b5-8ab5-ad6eb50be49d X-Archives-Hash: 2d483884d7d146889c75ed1ed0cb8c20 Maciej Mrozowski posted on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:59:56 +0200 as excerpted: > 1. Proposition to split desktop profile to: KDE, Gnome, (and maybe some > others). > That being said active presence of some Gnome guys would be most > appreciated. With that under discussion, what about a kde (or full desktop profile=20 tree) amd64 no-multilib profile? I've been using no-multilib for some time, but it doesn't have a desktop=20 subprofile. With multi-parent cascading, it shouldn't be difficult to=20 create one, kde specifically or desktop. Just having the appropriate no-multilib and kde or desktop as parents should do it I think. That=20 should take care of masking the 32-bit-only stuff and setting libdir and=20 whatever, plus setting grub-static as default system bootloader, which is= =20 more or less what no-multilib does, AFAIK. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman