From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MwlOI-0000SZ-RZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B91A5E06BF; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968DFE06BF for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BFC6799C for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.548 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CEwgtPrYs7Ti for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4432F67982 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MwlO5-0000fr-Dp for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:30:09 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:30:09 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:30:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3b8c8a98-411b-4f53-838b-681504c4869c X-Archives-Hash: 4fad23f9da3887a98fefa59f5984d048 Matthias Schwarzott posted on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:57:07 +0200 as excerpted: > sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 Just a heads-up for anyone reading this and thinking about upgrading, who= =20 hasn't yet. rc_start_wait is now in SECONDS, NOT the former MS, or at least it seems=20 to be for some of us. So at the default /etc/rc.conf setting of 100=20 (which I had doubled to 200 here), it'll wait for 100 seconds on several=20 scripts. That's longer than the 60-second wait others have built-in to=20 wait for their dependencies, causing various problems. So until this gets fixed, you may wish to set rc_start_wait=3D1 in=20 /etc/rc.conf, if you're trying the upgrade. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D288495 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D288495 (Also see 288494, which I filed not realizing the long timeout, thus=20 believing it had hung. It'll be marked a dup of the above momentarily...= ) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman