From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9s35-0001A8-3O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87D06E046E; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EC7E046E for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171D566975 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.934 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.934 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.665, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkWKsxtz4lon for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74A966888 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M9s2p-0007AK-Nq for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:07 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:07 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:07 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: How not to discuss Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone> <20090528004518.5a4f91b5@snowcone> <200905280828.13024.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528191457.21ab4546@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c11ba3aa-2962-4055-8c29-e3e0101a2253 X-Archives-Hash: af0745f231b0f91cd3383fb37a53c4b2 Ciaran McCreesh posted 20090528191457.21ab4546@snowcone, excerpted below, on Thu, 28 May 2009 19:14:57 +0100: > No, it's entirely objective. GLEP 55 clearly shows how the filename > based options are objectively better than anything else. Now that's just being facetious. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman