From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LORuP-0007mc-Js for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDEC5E03CC; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D84E03CC for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D54864495 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.961 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.961 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.638, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eX0vD2AUfMuI for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC98643BD for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LORuC-0005ao-FV for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:12 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:12 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:12 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Detecting Baselayout2/openrc - no-symlink profiles leading to breakage Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20090117230733.GV7944@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <49726F21.8010004@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: cea2667c-c606-4679-a2de-80258486c212 X-Archives-Hash: d114bbdd5a22429e535863ecabb88ec7 Friedrich Oslage posted 49726F21.8010004@gentoo.org= , excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:52:01 +0100: > Why not teach /sbin/runscript it's own version? With something like thi= s > we could also do stuff depending on a specific version of openrc: I happened to read the OP right before I headed in to work today, and=20 thus had some time to think it over. This was the exact same idea I came= =20 up with and was going to post it if someone hadn't, when I got back. You= =20 beat me to it! =3D:^) In fact, if Roy hasn't instituted something like this already upstream,=20 I'd be surprised if he doesn't take the idea and run with it as well, as=20 it's certainly convenient functionality to have and expose, and I can=20 think of all sorts of reasons it might come in handy and no reason not to= =20 do it. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman