From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0zIQ-0006jP-Kw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AA96E0207; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D435AE0207 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C0464452 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.936 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.936 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.663, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhkFVkrrt+H9 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F27A6444E for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L0mnf-0006cK-0H for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:39 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:38 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:38 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: An official Gentoo wiki Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20081112002116.12e12ac2@snowmobile> <1226596898.3918.4.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: eb0defcc-489e-45a5-9ca6-a90c09414ac8 X-Archives-Hash: daccb1887a7f9fea2ef594e8c68aa6fd Tobias Scherbaum posted 1226596898.3918.4.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de, excerpted below, on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:21:38 +0100: > Wikipedia started using an extension for marking pages as "validated". > See [1]. This would allow us to setup a group of "trusted people" > (developers, long-time users, well-known contributors - for example) wh= o > would be able to review pages and tag them that way. Non-reviewed pages > could show a header then clearly stating that this specific page hasn't > been reviewed and might contain inaccurate information. That sounds like a useful idea. They make it the default view. I think=20 I'd prefer a more normal HEAD view, but with a notation at the top=20 similar to: "This wiki page as it appeared on was=20 validated. Show me the validated version.= " --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman