From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoHJU-00058z-4v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1B6DE05F8; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF1E05FA for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475AE64BCA for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.835 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.835 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.764, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2+GdaRbaTbW for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A1564944 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KoHJJ-0004KL-AU for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:37 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-12-43.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.12.43]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:37 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-12-43.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-2 and src_configure in eclasses Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <18664.49886.385742.36918@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20081005150727.15d307c6@googlemail.com> <20081005161546.31446f38@gentoo.org> <20081005152420.1d1e3256@googlemail.com> <20081005170740.4a067aef@gentoo.org> <20081009102604.4f67ebe5@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-12-43.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 56b7b9af-5ab5-452f-a867-1877c177e3f7 X-Archives-Hash: 2093b6a156e4af81b4ef83ab57002391 "Alec Warner" posted b41005390810100017w3ca0b0c9ta8c37cb15ccdb473@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:17:14 -0700: > Consider this your first and last warning from Userrel. FWIW... at least on gmane, that appears as a response to aballier (gentoo= =20 dev), with references headers indicating the same thing, but given that=20 (1) there was no attribution or quote so it's not possible to say who it=20 was intended for directly, (2) I didn't see what was offensive in his=20 post, and (3) that the warning was from userrel not devrel, I believe the= =20 warning was intended for someone other than the direct parent (my=20 grandparent) poster. IOW, aballier may be very confused right about now... I know I was but at= =20 least it's not my posts in the balance like his appear to be, while=20 someone else (my public attempt at a guess who wouldn't help) may be=20 missing a warning they need to see (tho hopefully they got the message in= =20 any case). --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman