From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk9hF-0002D4-SF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:13:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A16E027B; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0E7E027B for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D176766F6D for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.417 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.417 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Px3bcKC-xnOQ for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C851B64699 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk9gU-0002xf-Ep for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:14 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:14 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:14 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 27 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <47FE7A18.1020207@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4c3195d9-6978-422c-9964-29601efe8f5a X-Archives-Hash: 2e2ead05c8409a8cef3eaa36c686a913 Doug Goldstein posted 47FE7A18.1020207@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400: > How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP > 27? >=20 > Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo? >=20 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html For those who don't know their GLEPs by number, this is Portage management of UIDs/GIDs. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list