From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jjxoy-0003H2-EP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CF15E03DB; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F4CE03E1 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845DC670AA for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.416 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.416 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2CqQkvUhNEh for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB05670A8 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jjxoh-0005gX-Sl for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:56 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:55 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:55 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.2 / gcc-4.3 plans Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200804100257.12187.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b7e35c5e-32a9-419d-9300-b3cbd4b9b0c8 X-Archives-Hash: c8460c22889da64648bd9af64ce710fe Mike Frysinger posted 200804100257.12187.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:57:11 -0400: > then move on to the gcc 4.3 tracker bug (#198121). once this gets belo= w > a certain critical mass (i wont know what the critical mass is until > it's been de-attained), then we'll be ~arching things. people are > recommended to do a quick sweep of the lower hangers (many bugs have > simple patches). Does this mean I can file bugs without patches whether they aren't yet=20 filed already, for still-failing ebuilds? Last I checked, I had a few=20 (3-4 I think, out of 600+ packages on my system, a dozen or so didn't=20 compile but most had bugs with patches already, and compiled after=20 applying them), but there have been enough updates since then I'll need=20 to re-test before I file in any case. I wasn't filing them since I didn't have patches and 4.3 was still hard- masked, but I have been keeping a list. =3D8^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list