* [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.7 stabilization
@ 2008-04-10 7:02 Mike Frysinger
2008-04-10 11:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Holger Hoffstaette
2008-04-10 14:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-04-10 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 576 bytes --]
some heads up here
glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the only
real issue holding it back is nscd. i never use this thing myself, but on
some arches (like ppc), it's known to eat your cpu like a dirty C-globbler
(where C is short for CPU). on other arches, it's known to just cream itself
for fun and then promptly exit.
glibc-2.8 is supposed to be out soonish, and if nscd insists on continuing to
be a pile, i'm afraid of having to just dump in a bunch of reverts. nscd in
glibc-2.6.1 seems to be generally OK.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.7 stabilization
2008-04-10 7:02 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.7 stabilization Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-04-10 11:43 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2008-04-10 14:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstaette @ 2008-04-10 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:02:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> some heads up here
>
> glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the
> only real issue holding it back is nscd. i never use this thing myself,
> but on some arches (like ppc), it's known to eat your cpu like a dirty
> C-globbler (where C is short for CPU). on other arches, it's known to
> just cream itself for fun and then promptly exit.
Interesting - I saw nscd dying every so often with 2.6 (x86) but at least
for me that seems to have stopped since 2.7. Not sure what I'm doing wrong :)
On slower systems it certainly makes a noticeable difference.
-h
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.7 stabilization
2008-04-10 7:02 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.7 stabilization Mike Frysinger
2008-04-10 11:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Holger Hoffstaette
@ 2008-04-10 14:15 ` "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
2008-04-10 20:15 ` Mike Frysinger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" @ 2008-04-10 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hey Mike:
Mike Frysinger escribió:
> some heads up here
>
> glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the only
> real issue holding it back is nscd.
In alpha we still have a bastard called 205099[1]. We need to track down
the real problem there and fix it before we can mark 2.7 even ~alpha.
Any help from toolchain ninjas is more than welcome. Thanks.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205099
--
Jose Luis Rivero <yoswink@gentoo.org>
Gentoo/Doc Gentoo/Alpha
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-10 20:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-10 7:02 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.7 stabilization Mike Frysinger
2008-04-10 11:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Holger Hoffstaette
2008-04-10 14:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
2008-04-10 20:15 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox