From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfxJb-0003SY-NV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:11:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F753E04D1; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8B2E04D1 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B136466D65 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.413 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nAif82hIBxT8 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4366A66827 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JfxIk-0005LS-73 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:22 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:22 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:22 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: explicit -r0 in ebuild filename Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20080330023902.GA8787@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080330034811.39942523@snowcone> <20080330031237.GA8925@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080330042057.089d0f8e@snowcone> <20080330041651.GA9041@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080330054044.780dd65e@snowcone> <20080330093946.GA9305@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-4.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 70fe9d5a-9e33-4f4e-889a-656d4b04db8e X-Archives-Hash: 4ee6b5d131ac6007b36fafaf3cff1ec6 Brian Harring posted 20080330093946.GA9305@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net, excerpted below, on=20 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:46 -0700: > No need to ban 1.00; it's already banned by PMS- quoting from names.tex= : >=20 > A version starts with the number part, which is in the form > \t{[0-9]+($\backslash$.[0-9]+)*} (a positive integer, followed by zero > or more dot-prefixed positive integers). >=20 > Note the 'positive integers'; so 1.00 is actually blocked by PMS. That > said, that same text seems to invalidly ban 1.0 also. Well, "positive integer" as used must include zero also, or by that=20 definition, 0.xx style versions would be disallowed as well. That just=20 wouldn't be sane if we're to keep anything even /close/ to upstream=20 version mapping, so "positive" as used here must include 0 (and does by=20 the literal ranged definition), and both 0.xx and x.00 are therefore=20 defined as allowed, unless there's a further restriction elsewhere that=20 hasn't been quoted. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list